Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda - Vol-5
XV
(Translated from Bengali)
DOCTRINE OF AHIMSA AND MEAT-EATING -SATTVA, RAJAS, TAMAS IN MAN
-FOOD AND SPIRITUALITY -'ÂHÂRA' -THREE DEFECTS IN FOOD
-DON'T-TOUCHISM AND CASTE-PREJUDICES -RESTORING THE OLD
CHATURVARNYA AND THE LAWS OF THE RISHIS
Disciple: Pray, Swamiji, do tell me if there is any relation
between the discrimination of food taken and the development of
spirituality in man.
Swamiji: Yes, there is, more or less.
Disciple: Is it proper or necessary to take fish and meat?
Swamiji: Ay, take them, my boy! And if there be any harm in
doing so, I will take care of that. Look at the masses of our
country! What a look of sadness on their faces and want of
courage and enthusiasm in their hearts, with large stomachs and
no strength in their hands and feet -a set of cowards frightened
at every trifle!
Disciple: Does the taking of fish and meat give strength? Why do
Buddhism and Vaishnavism preach "अहिंसा परमो धर्मः - Non-killing
is the highest virtue"?
Swamiji: Buddhism and Vaishnavism are not two different things.
During the decline of Buddhism in India, Hinduism took from her
a few cardinal tenets of conduct and made them her own, and
these have now come to be known as Vaishnavism. The Buddhist
tenet, "Non-killing is supreme virtue", is very good, but in
trying to enforce it upon all by legislation without paying any
heed to the capacities of the people at large, Buddhism has
brought ruin upon India. I have come across many a "religious
heron"! in India, who fed ants with sugar, and at the same
time would not hesitate to bring ruin on his own brother for the
sake of "filthy lucre"!
Disciple: But in the Vedas as well as in the laws of Manu, there
are injunctions to take fish and meat.
Swamiji: Ay, and injunctions to abstain from killing as well.
For the Vedas enjoin, "मा हिंस्यात् सर्वभूतानि - Cause no injury
to any being"; Manu also says, "निवृत्तिस्तु महाफला - Cessation
of desire brings great results." Killing and non-killing have
both been enjoined, according to the individual capacity, or
fitness and adaptability on those who will observe the one
practice or the other.
Disciple: It is the fashion here nowadays to give up fish and
meat as soon as one takes to religion, and to many it is more
sinful not to do so than to commit such great sins as adultery.
How, do you think, such notions came into existence?
Swamiji: What's the use of your knowing how they came, when you
see clearly, do you not, that such notions are working ruin to
our country and our society? Just see -the people of East Bengal
eat much fish, meat, and turtle, and they are much healthier
than those of this part of Bengal. Even the rich men of East
Bengal have not yet taken to Loochis or Châpâtis at night, and
they do not suffer from acidity and dyspepsia like us. I have
heard that in the villages of East Bengal the people have not
the slightest idea of what dyspepsia means!
Disciple: Quite so, Swamiji. We never complain of dyspepsia in
our part of the country. I first heard of it after coming to
these parts. We take fish with rice, mornings and evenings.
Swamiji: Yes, take as much of that as you can, without fearing
criticism. The country has been flooded with dyspeptic Bâbâjis
living on vegetables only. That is no sign of Sattva, but of
deep Tamas -the shadow of death. Brightness in the face,
undaunted enthusiasm in the heart, and tremendous activity
-these result from Sattva; whereas idleness, lethargy,
inordinate attachment, and sleep are the signs of Tamas.
Disciple: But do not fish and meat increase Rajas in man?
Swamiji: That is what I want you to have. Rajas is badly needed
just now! More than ninety per cent of those whom you now take
to be men with the Sattva, quality are only steeped in the
deepest Tamas. Enough, if you find one-sixteenth of them to be
really Sâttvika! What we want now is an immense awakening of
Râjasika energy, for the whole country is wrapped in the shroud
of Tamas. The people of this land must be fed and clothed -must
be awakened -must be made more fully active. Otherwise they will
become inert, as inert as trees and stones. So, I say, eat large
quantities of fish and meat, my boy!
Disciple: Does a liking for fish and meat remain when one has
fully developed the Sattva quality?
Swamiji: No, it does not. All liking for fish and meat
disappears when pure Sattva is highly developed, and these are
the signs of its manifestation in a soul: sacrifice of
everything for others, perfect non-attachment to lust and
wealth, want of pride and egotism. The desire for animal food
goes when these things are seen in a man. And where such
indications are absent, and yet you find men siding with the
non-killing party, know it for a certainty that herein, there is
either hypocrisy or a show of religion. When you yourself come
to that stage of pure Sattva, give up fish and meat, by all
means.
Disciple: In the Chhândogya Upanishad (VII. xxvi. 2) there is
this passage, "आहारशुद्धौ सत्त्वशुद्धिः -Through pure food the
Sattva quality in a man becomes pure."
Swamiji: Yes, I know. Shankarâchârya has said that the word
Âhâra there means "objects of the senses", whereas Shri Râmânuja
has taken the meaning of Ahara to be "food". In my opinion we
should take that meaning of the word which reconciles both these
points of view. Are we to pass our lives discussing all the time
about the purity and impurity of food only, or are we to
practice the restraining of our senses? Surely, the restraining
of the senses is the main object; and the discrimination of good
and bad, pure and impure foods, only helps one, to a certain
extent, in gaining that end. There are, according to our
scriptures, three things which make food impure: (1) Jâti-dosha
or natural defects of a certain class of food, like onions,
garlic, etc.; (2) Nimitta-dosha or defects arising from the
presence of external impurities in it, such as dead insects,
dust, etc. that attach to sweetmeats bought from shops; (3)
Âshraya-dosha or defects that arise by the food coming from evil
sources, as when it has been touched and handled by wicked
persons. Special care should be taken to avoid the first and
second classes of defects. But in this country men pay no regard
just to these two, and go on fighting for the third alone, the
very one that none but a Yogi could really discriminate! The
country from end to end is being bored to extinction by the cry,
"Don't touch", "Don't touch", of the non-touchism party. In that
exclusive circle of theirs, too, there is no discrimination of
good and bad men, for their food may be taken from the hands of
anyone who wears a thread round his neck and calls himself a
Brâhmin! Shri Ramakrishna was quite unable to take food in this
indiscriminate way from the hands of any and all. It happened
many a time that he would not accept food touched by a certain
person or persons, and on rigorous investigation it would turn
out that these had some particular stain to hide. Your religion
seems nowadays to be confined to the cooking-pot alone. You put
on one side the sublime truths of religion and fight, as they
say, for the skin of the fruit and not for the fruit itself!
Disciple: Do you mean, then, that we should eat the food handled
by anyone and everyone?
Swamiji: Why so? Look here. You being Brahmin of a certain
class, say, of the Bhattâcharya class, why should you not eat
rice cooked by Brahmins of all classes? Why should you, who
belong to the Rârhi section, object to taking rice cooked by a
Brahmin of the Barendra section, or why should a Barendra object
to taking your rice? Again, why should not the other subcastes
in the west and south of India, e.g. the Marathi, Telangi,
Kanouji, do the same? Do you not see that hundreds of Brahmins
and Kâyasthas in Bengal now go secretly to eat dainties in
public restaurants, and when they come out of those places pose
as leaders of society and frame rules to support don't-touchism.
Must our society really be guided by laws dictated by such
hypocrites? No, I say. On the contrary we must turn them out.
The laws laid down by the great Rishis of old must be brought
back and be made to rule supreme once more. Then alone can
national well-being be ours.
Disciple: Then, do not the laws laid down by the Rishis rule and
guide our present society?
Swamiji: Vain delusion! Where indeed is that the case nowadays?
Nowhere have I found the laws of the Rishis current in India,
even when during my travels I searched carefully and thoroughly.
The blind and not unoften meaningless customs sanctioned by the
people, local prejudices and ideas, and the usages and
ceremonials prevalent amongst women, are what really govern
society everywhere! How many care to read the Shâstras or to
lead society according to their ordinances after careful study?
Disciple: What are we to do, then?
Swamiji: We must revive the old laws of the Rishis. We must
initiate the whole people into the codes of our old Manu and
Yâjnavalkya, with a few modifications here and there to adjust
them to the changed circumstances of the time. Do you not see
that nowhere in India now are the original four castes
(Châturvarnya) to be found? We have to redivide the whole Hindu
population, grouping it under the four main castes, of Brahmins,
Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras, as of old. The numberless
modern subdivisions of the Brahmins that split them up into so
many castes, as it were, have to be abolished and a single
Brahmin caste to be made by uniting them all. Each of the three
remaining castes also will have to be brought similarly into
single groups, as was the case in Vedic times. Without this will
the Motherland be really benefited by your simply crying as you
do nowadays, "We won't touch you!; We won't take him back into
our caste!"? Never, my boy!
SAYINGS AND UTTERANCES
1. Man is born to conquer nature and not to follow it.
2. When you think you are a body, are apart from the universe;
when you think; you are a soul, you are a spark from the great
Eternal Fire; when you think you are the Âtman (Self), you are
All.
3. The will is not free -it is a phenomenon bound by cause and
effect -but there is something behind the will which is free.
4. Strength is in goodness, in purity.
5. The universe is -objectified God.
6. You cannot believe in God until you believe in yourself.
7. The root of evil is in the illusion that we are bodies. This,
if any, is the original sin.
8. One party says thought is caused by matter, and the other
says matter is caused by thought. Both statements are wrong;
matter and thought are coexistent. There is a third something of
which both matter and thought are products.
9. As particles of matter combine in space, so mind-waves
combine in time.
10. To define God is -grinding the already ground; for He is the
only being we know.
11. Religion is the idea which is raising the brute unto man,
and man unto God.
12. External nature is only internal nature writ large.
13. The motive is the measure of your work. What motive can be
higher than that you are God, and that the lowest man is also
God?
14. The observer in the psychic world needs to be very strong
and scientifically trained.
15. To believe that mind is all, that thought is all is only a
higher materialism.
16. This world is the great gymnasium where we come to make
ourselves strong.
17. You cannot teach a child any more than you can grow a plant.
All you can do is on the negative side -you can only help. It is
a manifestation from within; it develops its own nature -you can
only take away obstructions.
18. As soon as you make a sect, you protest against universal
brotherhood. Those who really feel universal brotherhood do not
talk much, but their very actions speak aloud.
19. Truth can be stated in a thousand different ways, yet each
one can be true.
20. You have to grow from inside out. None can teach you, none
can make you spiritual. There is no other teacher but your own
soul.
21. If in an infinite chain a few links can be explained, by the
same method all can be explained.
22. That man has reached immortality who is disturbed by nothing
material.
23. Everything can be sacrificed for truth, but truth cannot be
sacrificed for anything.
24. The search for truth is the expression of strength -not the
groping of a weak, blind man.
25. God has become man; man will become God again.
26. It is child's talk that a man dies and goes to heaven. We
never come nor go. We are where we are. All the souls that have
been, are, and will be, are on one geometrical point.
27. He whose book of the heart has been opened needs no other
books. Their only value is to create desire in us. They are
merely the experiences of others.
28. Have charity towards all beings. Pity those who are in
distress. Love all creatures. Do not be jealous of anyone. Look
not to the faults of others.
29. Man never dies, nor is he ever born; bodies die, but he
never dies.
30. No one is born into a religion, but each one is born for a
religion.
31. There is really but one Self in the universe, all else is
but Its manifestations.
32. All the worshippers are divided into the common masses and
the brave few.
33. If it is impossible to attain perfection here and now, there
is no proof that we can attain perfection in any other life.
34. If I know one lump of clay perfectly, I know all the clay
there is. This is the knowledge of principles, but their
adaptations are various. When you know yourself you know all.
35. Personally I take as much of the Vedas as agrees with
reason. Parts of the Vedas are apparently contradictory. They
are not considered as inspired in the Western sense of the word,
but as the sum total of the knowledge of God, omniscience. This
knowledge comes out at the beginning of a cycle and manifests
itself; and when the cycle ends, it goes down into minute form.
When the cycle is projected again, that knowledge is projected
again with it. So far the theory is all right. But that only
these books which are called the Vedas are His knowledge is mere
sophistry. Manu says in one pace that that part of the Vedas
which agrees with reason is the Vedas and nothing else. Many of
our philosophers have taken this view.
36. Of all the scriptures of the world it is the Vedas alone
that declare that even the study of the Vedas is secondary. The
real study is "that by which we realise the Unchangeable". And
that is neither reading, for believing, nor reasoning, but super
conscious perception, or Samâdhi.
37. We have been low animals once. We think they are something
different from us. I hear, Western people say, "The world was
created for us." If tigers could write books, they would say,
man was created for them and that man is a most sinful animal,
because he does not allow him (the tiger) to catch him easily.
The worm that crawls under your feet today is a God to be.
38. "I should very much like our women to have your
intellectuality, but not if it must be at the cost of purity",
said Swami Vivekananda in New York. "I admire you for all that
you know, but I dislike the way that you cover what is bad with
roses and call it good. Intellectuality is not the highest good.
Morality and spirituality are the things for which we strive.
Our women are not so learned, but they are more pure.
"To all women every man save her husband should be as her son.
To all men every woman save his own wife should be as his
mother. When I look about me and see what you call gallantry, my
soul is filled with disgust. Not until you learn to ignore the
question of sex and to meet on a ground of common humanity will
your women really develop. Until then they are playthings,
nothing more. All this is the cause of divorce. Your men bow low
and offer a chair, but in another breath they offer compliments.
They say, 'Oh, madam, how beautiful are your eyes!' What right
have they to do this? How dare a man venture so far, and how can
you women permit it? Such things develop the less noble side of
humanity. They do not tend to nobler ideals.
"We should not think that we are men and women. but only that we
are human beings, born to cherish and to help one another. No
sooner are a young man and a young woman left alone than he pays
compliments to her, and perhaps before he takes a wife, he has
courted two hundred women. Bah! If I belonged to the marrying
set, I could find a woman to love without all that!
"When I was in India and saw these things from the outside, I
was told it was all right, it was mere pleasantry and I believed
it. But I have travelled since then, and I know it is not right.
It is wrong, only you of the West shut your eyes and call it
good. The trouble with the nations of the West is that they are
young, foolish, fickle, and wealthy. What mischief can come of
one of these qualities; but when all three, all four, are
combined beware!"
But severe as the Swami was upon all, Boston received the
hardest blow:
"Of all, Boston is the worst. There the women are all faddists,
all fickle, merely bent on following something new and strange."
39. "Where is the spirituality one would expect in a country",
he said in America, "that is so boastful of its civilisation?"
40. "Here" and "hereafter" are words to frighten children. It is
all "here". To live and move in God even here, even in this
body, all self should go out, all superstition should be
banished. Such persons live in India. Where are such in this
country (America)? Your preachers speak against dreamers. The
people of this country would be better off if there were more
dreamers. There is a good deal of difference between dreaming
and the brag of the nineteenth century. The whole world is full
of God and not of sin. Let us help one another, let us love one
another.
41. Let me die a true Sannyâsin as my Master did, heedless of
money, of women, and of fame! And of these the most insidious is
the love of fame!
42. I have never spoken of revenge, I have always spoken of
strength. Do we dream of revenging ourselves on this drop of
sea-spray? But it is a great thing to a mosquito!
43. "This is a great land," said Swamiji on one occasion in
America, "but I would not like to live here. Americans think too
much of money. They give it preference over anything else. Your
people have much to learn. When your nation is as old as ours,
you will be wiser."
44. It may be that I shall find it good to get outside of my
body -to cast it off like a disused garment. But I shall not
cease to work! I shall inspire men everywhere, until the world
shall know that it is one with God.
45. All that I am, all that the world itself will someday be, is
owing to my Master, Shri Ramakrishna, who incarnated and
experienced and taught this wonderful unity which underlies
everything, having discovered it alike in Hinduism, in Islam,
and in Christianity.
46. Give the organ of taste a free rein, and the other organs
will also run on unbridled.
47. Jnâna, Bhakti, Yoga and Karma -these are the four paths
which lead to salvation. One must follow the path for which one
is best suited; but in this age special stress should be laid on
Karma-Yoga.
48. Religion is not a thing of imagination but of direct
perception. He who has seen even a single spirit is greater than
many a book-learned Pandit.
49. Once Swamiji was praising someone very much; at this, one
sitting nearby said to him, "But he does not believe in you."
Hearing this, Swamiji at once replied: "Is there any legal
affidavit that he should have to do so? He is doing good work,
and so he is worthy of praise."
50. In the domain of true religion, book-learning has no right
to enter.
51. The downfall of a religious sect begins from the day that
the worship of the rich enters into it.
52. If you want to do anything evil, do it before the eyes of
your superiors.
53. By the grace of the Guru, a disciple becomes a Pandit
(scholar) even without reading books.
54. There is no sin nor virtue: there is only ignorance. By
realisation of non-duality this ignorance is dispelled.
55. Religious movements come in groups. Each one of them tries
to rear itself above the rest. But as a rule only one of them
really grows in strength, and this, in the long run, swallows up
all the contemporary movements.
56. When Swamiji was at Ramnad, he said in the course of a
conversation that Shri Râma was the Paramâtman and that Sitâ was
the Jivâtman, and each man's or woman's body was the Lanka
(Ceylon). The Jivatman which was enclosed in the body, or
captured in the island of Lankâ, always desired to be in
affinity with the Paramatman, or Shri Rama. But the Râkshasas
would not allow it, and Rakshasas represented certain traits of
character. For instance, Vibhishana represented Sattva Guna;
Râvana, Rajas; and Kumbhakarna, Tamas. Sattva Guna means
goodness; Rajas means lust and passions, and Tamas darkness,
stupor, avarice, malice, and its concomitants. These Gunas keep
back Sita, or Jivatman, which is in the body, or Lanka, from
joining Paramatman, or Rama. Sita, thus imprisoned and trying to
unite with her Lord, receives a visit from Hanumân, the Guru or
divine teacher, who shows her the Lord's ring, which is
Brahma-Jnâna, the supreme wisdom that destroys all illusions;
and thus Sita finds the way to be at one with Shri Rama, or, in
other words, the Jivatman finds itself one with the Paramatman.
57. A true Christian is a true Hindu, and a true Hindu is a true
Christian.
58. All healthy social changes are the manifestations of the
spiritual forces working within, and if these are strong and
well adjusted, society will arrange itself accordingly. Each
individual has to work out his own salvation; there is no other
way, and so also with nations. Again, the great institutions of
every nation are the conditions of its very existence and cannot
be transformed by the mould of any other race. Until higher
institutions have been evolved, any attempt to break the old
ones will be disastrous. Growth is always gradual.
It is very easy to point out the defects of institutions, all
being more or less imperfect, but he is the real benefactor of
humanity who helps the individual to overcome his imperfections
under whatever institutions he may live. The individuals being
raised, the nation and its institutions are bound to rise. Bad
customs and laws are ignored by the virtuous, and unwritten but
mightier laws of love, sympathy, and integrity take their place.
Happy is the nation which can rise to the necessity of but few
law books, and needs no longer to bother its head about this or
that institution. Good men rise beyond all laws, and will help
their fellows to rise under whatever conditions they live.
The salvation of India, therefore, depends on the strength of
the individual, and the realisation by each man of the divinity
within.
59. Spirituality can never be attained until materiality is
gone.
60. The first discourse in the Gita can be taken allegorically.
61. "Swami, you have no idea of time", remarked an impatient
American devotee, afraid of missing a steamer. "No," retorted
Swamiji calmly, "you live in time; we live in eternity!"
62. We are always letting sentiment usurp the place of duty and
flatter ourselves that we are acting in response to true love.
63. We must get beyond emotionalism if we want the power to
renounce. Emotion belongs to the animals. They are creatures of
emotion entirely.
64. It is not sacrifice of a high order to die for one's young.
The animals do that, and just as readily as any human mother
ever did. It is no sign of real love to do that; it is merely
blind emotion.
65. We are forever trying to make our weakness look like
strength, our sentiment like love, our cowardice like courage,
and so on.
66. Say to your soul in regard to vanities, weakness, etc.,
"This does not befit thee. This does not befit thee."
67. Never loved a husband the wife for the wife's sake or the
wife the husband for the husband's sake. It is God in the wife
the husband loves, and God in the husband the wife loves. It is
God in every one that draws us to the one we love, God in
everything and in everybody that makes us love. God is the only
love.
68. Oh, if only you knew yourselves! You are souls; you are
Gods. If ever I feel like blaspheming, it; is when I call you
man.
69. In everyone is God, the Atman; all else is but dream, an
illusion.
70. If I do not find bliss in the life of the Spirit, shall, I
seek satisfaction in the life of the senses? If I cannot get
nectar; shall I fall back upon ditch water? The bird called
Châtaka drinks from the clouds only, ever calling as it soars,
"Pure water! Pure water!" And no storms or tempests make it
falter on wing or descend to drink from the earth.
71. Any sect that may help you to realise God is welcome.
Religion is the realising of God.
72. An atheist can be charitable but not religious. But the
religious man must be charitable.
73. Everyone makes shipwreck on the rock of would-be Guruism,
except those souls that were born to be Gurus.
74. Man is a compound of animality, humanity, and divinity.
75. The term "social progress" has as much meaning as "hot ice"
or "dark light". There is no such thing, ultimately, as "social
progress"!
76. Things are not bettered, but we are bettered, by making
changes in them.
77. Let me help my fellow men; that is all I seek.
78. "No", said the Swami, very softly, in answer to a question
in New York, "I do not believe in the occult. If a thing be
unreal, it is not. What is unreal does not exist. Strange things
are natural phenomena. I know them to be matters of science.
Then they are not occult to me. I do not believe in occult
societies. They do no good, and can never do good."
79. There are four general types of men -the rational, the
emotional, the mystical, and the worker. For each of these we
must provide suitable forms of worship. There comes the rational
man, who says, "I care not for this form of worship. Give me the
philosophical, the rational -that I can appreciate." So for the
rational man is the rational philosophic worship.
There comes the worker. He says, "I care not for the worship of
the philosopher. Give me work to do for my fellow men." So for
him is provided work as the path of worship. As for the mystical
and the emotional, we have their respective modes of devotion.
All these men have, in religion, the elements of their faith.
80. I stand for truth. Truth will never ally itself with
falsehood. Even if all the world should be against me, Truth
must prevail in the end.
81. Wherever you see the most humanitarian ideas fall into the
hands of the multitude, the first result you notice is
degradation. It is learning and intellect that help to keep
things safe. It is the cultured among a community that are the
real custodians of religion and philosophy in their purest form.
It is that form which serves as the index for the intellectual
and social condition of a community.
82. "I do not come", said Swamiji on one occasion in America,
"to convert you to a new belief. I want you to keep your own
belief; I want to make the Methodist a better Methodist; the
Presbyterian a better Presbyterian; the Unitarian a better
Unitarian. I want to teach you to live the truth, to reveal the
light within your own soul."
83. Happiness presents itself before man, wearing the crown of
sorrow on its head. He who welcomes it must also welcome sorrow.
84. He is free, he is great, who turns his back upon the world,
who has renounced everything, who has controlled his passion,
and who thirsts for peace. One may gain political and social
independence, but if one is a slave to his passions and desires,
one cannot feel the pure joy of real freedom.
85. Doing good to others is virtue (Dharma); injuring others is
sin. Strength and manliness are virtue; weakness and cowardice
are sin. Independence is virtue; dependence is sin. Loving
others is virtue; hating others is sin. Faith in God and in
one's own Self is virtue; doubt is sin. Knowledge of oneness is
virtue; seeing diversity is sin. The different scriptures only
show the means of attaining virtue.
86. When, by reasoning, Truth is comprehended by the intellect,
then it is realised in the heart, the fountainhead of feeling.
Thus the head and the heart become illumined at the same moment;
and then only, as says the Upanishad, "The knot of the heart is
rent asunder, and all doubts cease" (Mundaka Upanishad,
II.ii.8).
When in ancient times this knowledge (Jnâna) and this feeling
(Bhâva) thus blossomed forth simultaneously in the heart of the
Rishi, then the Highest Truth became poetic, and then the Vedas
and other scriptures were composed. It is for this reason that
one finds, in studying them, that the two parallel lines of
Bhava and Jnana have at last met, as it were, in the plane of
the Vedas and become combined and inseparable.
87. The scriptures of different religions point out different
means to attain the ideals of universal love, freedom,
manliness, and selfless benevolence. Every religious sect is
generally at variance as to its idea of what is virtue and what
is vice, and fights with others over the means of attaining
virtue and eschewing vice, instead of aiming at realising the
end. Every means is helpful more or less, and the Gita
(XVIII.48) says, "Every undertaking is attended with defects as
fire with smoke"; so the means will no doubt appear more or less
defective. But as we are to attain the highest virtue through
the means laid dozen in our respective scriptures, we should try
our best to follow them. Moreover, they should be tempered with
reason and discrimination. Thus, as we progress, the riddle of
virtue and vice will be solved by itself.
88. How many in our country truly understand the Shastras
nowadays? They have only learnt such words as Brahman, Maya,
Prakriti, and so on, and confuse their heads with them. Setting
aside the real meaning and purpose of the Shastras, they fight
over the words only. If the Shastras cannot help all men in all
conditions at all times, of what use, then, are such Shastras?
If the Shastras show the way to the Sannyasins only and not to
the householders, then what need has a householder for such
one-sided Shastras? If the Shastras can only help men when they
give up all work and retire into the forests, and cannot show
the way of lighting the lamp of hope in the hearts of men of the
workaday world -in the midst of their daily toil, disease,
misery, and poverty, in the despondency of the penitent, in the
self-reproach of the downtrodden, in the terror of the
battlefield, in lust, anger and pleasure, in the joy of victory,
in the darkness of defeat, and finally, in the dreaded night of
death -then weak humanity has no need of such Shastras, and such
Shastras will be no Shastras at all!
89. Through Bhoga (enjoyment) Yoga will come in time. But alas,
such is the lot of my countrymen that, not to speak of
possessing yoga, they cannot even have a little Bhoga! Suffering
all sorts of indignities they can with the utmost difficulty
only meet the barest needs of the body -and even that everyone
cannot do! It is strange that such a state of affairs does not
disturb our sleep and rouse us to our immediate duties.
90. Agitate ever so much for your rights and privileges, but
remember that so long as we do not truly elevate ourselves by
rousing intensely the feeling of self-respect in the nation, so
long our hope of gaining rights and privileges is like the
day-dream of Alnascar.
91. When a genius of a man with some special great power is
born, all the best and the most creative faculties of his whole
heredity are drawn towards the making up of his personality and
squeezed dry, as it were. It is for this reason that we find
that all those who are subsequently born in such a family are
either idiots or men of very ordinary calibre and that in time
such a family in many cases becomes extinct.
92. If you cannot attain salvation in this life, what proof is
there that you can attain it in the life or lives to come?
93. While visiting the Taj at Agra he remarked: "If you squeeze
a bit of this marble, it will drip drops of royal love and its
sorrow." Further he observed, "It takes really six months to
study a square inch of its interior works of beauty."
94. When the real history of India will be unearthed, it will be
proved that, as in matters of religion, so in fine arts, India
is the primal Guru of the whole world.
95. Speaking of architecture he said: "People say Calcutta is a
city of palaces, but the houses look much like so many boxes
placed one upon the other! They convey no idea whatever. In
Rajputana you can still find much pure Hindu architecture. If
you look at a Dharmashala, you will feel as if it calls you with
open arms to take shelter within and partake of its unqualified
hospitableness. If you look at a temple, you are sure to find a
Divine Presence in and about it. If you look about a rural
cottage, you will at once be able to comprehend the special
meanings of its different portions, and that the whole structure
bears evidence to the predominant nature and ideal of the owner
thereof. This sort of expressive architecture I have seen
nowhere else except in Italy."
Writings: Prose and Poems
(Original and Translated)
REASON, FAITH AND LOVE
[Swamiji had made the home of the Hale family his headquarters
during almost all of 1894 before the pivot of his activities
moved eastward to the Atlantic Coast. It was on George W. Hale's
letter paper and thus, presumably, during one of his stays in
the latter's home, that Swamiji jotted down in pencil a series
of notes on the subjects of reason, faith, and love, which have
recently come to light. Unfortunately the date of the manuscript
cannot be accurately determined.]
Reason -has its limits -its base -
its degeneration. The walls round it -
Agnosticism. Atheism. But must not stop
The beyond is acting upon influencing us every
moment -the sky the stars acting upon us -even
those not seen. Therefore must go beyond -reason
alone can't go -finite cannot get at the infinite
Faith its degeneration when alone -bigotry
fanaticism -sectarianism. Narrowing
finite therefore cannot get to the infinite
Sometimes gain in intensity but loses in
extensity -and in bigots & fanatics become
worship of his own pride & vanity
Is there no other way -there is Love
it never degenerates -peaceful softening
ever widening -the universe is too small
for its expansiveness.
We cannot define it we can only trace
it through its development and describe its surroundings
It is at first -what the gravitation
is to the external world -a tendency to unification
forms and conventionalities are its death.
Worship through forms -methods -services
forms -up to then no love.
When love comes method dies.
Human language and human forms God as father, God as mother, God
as
the lover -Surata-vardhanam etc. Solomon's Song of
Songs -Dependence and independence
Love Love -
Love the chaste wife -Anasuya Sita -
not as hard dry duty but as ever pleasing
love -Sita worship -
The madness of Love -God intoxicated man
The allegory of Radha -misunderstood
The restriction more increase -
Lust is the death of love
Self is the death of love
individual to general
Concrete to abstract -to absolute
The praying Mohammedan and the girl
The Sympathy -Kabir -
The Christian nun from whose hands blood came
The Mohammedan Saint
Every particle seeking its own complement
When it finds that it is at rest
Every man seeking -happiness -& stability
The search is real but the objects are themselves
but happiness is coming to them momentary at least
through the search of these objects.
The only object unchangeable and the only complement of
character and aspirations of the human Soul is God.
Love is struggle of a human Soul to find its complement its
stable equilibrium its infinite rest.
SIX SANSKRIT MOTTOES
(Reproduced from Swami Vivekananda in America: New Discoveries.
These together with the English translations, were transcribed
by Swamiji in six of his photographs.)
1. Ajarâmaravat prâjnah vidyâm
artham cha chintayet
Grihita iva kesheshu mrityunâ
dharmam âcharet
When in search of knowledge or prosperity think that thou would
never have death or disease, and when worshipping God think that
death's hand is in your hair.
2. Eka eve suhrid dharma
nidhanepyanuyâti yah
Virtue is the only friend which follows us even beyond the
grave.
Everything else ends with death.
VIVEKANANDA.
3. One infinite pure and holy -beyond
thought beyond qualities I bow down
to thee
Swami Vivekananda.
4. Samatâ sarva-bhuteshu etanmuktasya lakshanam.
Equality in all beings this is the sign of the free
Vivekananda.
5. Thou art the only treasure in this world
Vivekananda.
6. Thou art the father the lord the
mother the husband and love
Swami Vivekananda.
THE MESSAGE OF DIVINE WISDOM
[The following three chapters were discovered among Swami
Vivekananda's papers. He evidently intended to write a book and
jotted down some points for the work.]
I BONDAGE
II THE LAW
III THE ABSOLUTE AND THE ATTAINMENT OF FREEDOM
I
BONDAGE
1. Desire is infinite, its fulfilment limited. Desire is
unlimited in everyone; the power of fulfilment varies. Thus some
are more successful than others in life.
2. This limitation is the bondage we are struggling against all
our lives.
3. We desire only the pleasurable, not the painful.
4. The objects of desire are all complex -pleasure-giving and
pain-bringing mixed up.
5. We do not or cannot see the painful parts in objects, we are
charmed with only the pleasurable portion; and, thus grasping
the pleasurable, we unwittingly draw in the painful.
6. At times we vainly hope that in our case only the pleasurable
will come, leaving the painful aside, which never happens.
7. Our desires also are constantly changing - what we would
prize today we would reject tomorrow. The pleasure of the
present will be the pain of the future, the loved hated and so
on.
8. We vainly hope that in the future life we shall be able to
gather in only the pleasurable, to the exclusion of the painful.
9. The future is only the extension of the present. Such a thing
cannot be!
10. Whosoever seeks pleasure in objects will get it, but he must
take the pain with it.
11. All objective pleasure in the long run must bring pain,
because of the fact of change or death.
12. Death is the goal of all objects; change is the nature of
all objective things.
13. As desire increases, so increases the power of pleasure, so
the power of pain.
14. The finer the organism, the higher the culture - the greater
is the power to enjoy pleasure and the sharper are the pangs of
pain.
15. Mental pleasures are greatly superior to physical joys.
Mental pains are more poignant than physical tortures.
16. The power of thought, of looking far away into the future,
and the power of memory, of recalling the past to the present,
make us live in heaven; they make us live in hell also.
17. The man who can collect the largest amount of pleasurable
objects around him is as a rule too unimaginative to enjoy them.
The man of great imagination is thwarted by the intensity of his
feeling of loss, or fear of loss, or perception of defects.
18. We are struggling hard to conquer pain, succeeding in the
attempt, and yet creating new pains at the same time.
19. We achieve success, and we are overthrown by failure; we
pursue pleasure and we are pursued by pain.
20. We say we do, we are made to do. We say we work, we are made
to labour. We say we live, we are made to die every moment. We
are in the crowd, we cannot stop, must go on -it deserves no
cheering. Had it not been so, no amount of cheering would make
us undertake all this pain and misery for a grain of pleasure -
which, alas, in most cases is only a hope!
21. Our pessimism is a dread reality, our optimism is a faint
cheering, making the best of a bad job.
II
THE LAW
1. The law is never separate from the phenomena, the principle
from the person.
2. The law is the method of action or poise of every single
phenomenon within its scope.
3. We get our knowledge of law from the massing and welding of
changes that occur. We never see law beyond these changes. The
idea of law as something separate from phenomena is a mental
abstraction, a convenient use of words and nothing more. Law is
a part of every change within its range, a manner which resides
in the things governed by the law. The power resides in the
things, is a part of our idea of that thing - its action upon
something else is in a certain manner - this is our law.
4. Law is in the actual state of things - it is in how they act
towards each other, and not in how they should. It might have
been better if fire did not burn or water wet; but that they do
- this is the law; and if it is a true law, a fire that does not
burn or water that does not wet is neither fire nor water.
5. Spiritual laws, ethical laws, social laws, national laws -
are laws if they are parts of existing spiritual and human units
and the unfailing experience of the action of every unit said to
be bound by such laws.
6. We, by turn, are made by law and make it. A generalization of
what man does invariably in certain circumstances is a law with
regard to man in that particular aspect. It is the invariable,
universal human action that is law for man -and which no
individual can escape -and yet the summation of the action of
each individual is the universal Law. The sum total, or the
universal, or the infinite is fashioning the individual, while
the individual is keeping by its action the Law alive. Law in
this sense is another name for the universal. The universal is
dependent upon the individual, the individual dependent upon the
universal. It is an infinite made up of finite parts, an
infinite of number, though involving the difficulty of assuming
an infinity summed up of finites -yet for all practical
purposes, it is a fact before us. And as the law, or whole, or
the infinite cannot be destroyed -and the destruction of a part
of an infinite is an impossibility, as we cannot either add
anything to or subtract anything from the infinite -each part
persists forever.
7. Laws regarding the materials of which the body of man is
composed have been found out, and also the persistence of these
materials through time has been shown. The elements which
composed the body of a man a hundred thousand years ago have
been proved to be still existing in some place or other. The
thoughts which have been projected also are living in other
minds.
8. But the difficulty is to find a law about the man beyond the
body.
9. The spiritual and ethical laws are not the method of action
of every human being. The systems of ethics of morality, even of
national laws, are honoured more in the breach than in the
observance. If they were laws how could they be broken?
10. No man is able to go against the laws of nature. How is it
that we always complain of his breaking the moral laws, national
laws?
11. The national laws at best are the embodied will of a
majority of the nation -always a state of things wished for, not
actually existing.
12. The ideal law may be that no man should covet the belongings
of others, but the actual law is that a very large number do.
13. Thus the word law used in regard to laws of nature has a
very different interpretation when applied to ethics and human
actions generally.
14. Analysing the ethical laws of the world and comparing them
with the actual state of things, two laws stand out supreme. The
one, that of repelling everything from us -separating ourselves
from everyone -which leads to self-aggrandisement even at the
cost of everyone else's happiness. The other, that of
self-sacrifice -of taking no thought of ourselves -only of
others. Both spring from the search for happiness -one, of
finding happiness in injuring others and the ability of feeling
that happiness only in our own senses. The other, of finding
happiness in doing good to others -the ability of feeling happy,
as it were, through the senses of others The great and good of
the world are those who have the latter power predominating. Yet
both these are working side by side conjointly; in almost
everyone they are found in mixture, one or the other
predominating. The thief steals, perhaps, for someone he loves.
III
THE ABSOLUTE AND THE ATTAINMENT OF FREEDOM
1. Om Tat Sat - that Being - Knowing - Bliss.
(a) The only real Existence, which alone is -everything else
exists inasmuch as it reflects that real Existence.
(b) It is the only Knower -the only Self-luminous -the Light of
consciousness. Everything else shines by light borrowed from It.
Everything else knows inasmuch as it reflects Its knowing.
(c) It is the only Blessedness -as in It there is no want. It
comprehends all -is the essence of all.
It is Sat-Chit-Ânanda.
(d) It has no parts, no attributes, neither pleasure nor pain,
nor is it matter nor mind. It is the Supreme, Infinite,
Impersonal Self in everything, the Infinite Ego of the Universe.
(e) It is the Reality in me, in thee, and in everything -
therefore,
"That thou art" - Tattvamasi.
2. The same Impersonal is conceived by the mind as the Creator,
the Ruler, and the Dissolver of this universe, its material as
well as its efficient cause, the Supreme Ruler -the Living, the
Loving, the Beautiful, in the highest sense.
(a) The Absolute Being is manifested in Its highest in Isvara,
or the Supreme Ruler, as the highest and omnipotent Life or
Energy.
(b) The Absolute Knowledge is manifesting Itself in Its highest
as Infinite Love, in the Supreme Lord.
(c) The Absolute Bliss is manifested as the Infinite Beautiful,
in the Supreme Lord. He is the greatest attraction of the soul.
Satyam-Shivam-Sundaram.
The Absolute or Brahman, the Sat-Chit-Ananda, is Impersonal and
the real Infinite
Every existence from the highest to the lowest, all manifest
according to their degree as - energy (in the higher life),
attraction (in the higher love), and struggle for equilibrium
(in the higher happiness). This highest Energy-Love-Beauty is a
person, an individual, the Infinite Mother of this universe -the
God of gods -the Lord of lords, omnipresent yet separate from
the universe -the Soul of souls, yet separate from every soul
-the Mother of this universe, because She has produced it - its
Ruler, because She guides it with the greatest love and in the
long run brings everything back to Herself. Through Her command
the sun and moon shine, the clouds rain, and death stalks upon
the earth.
She is the power of all causation. She energises every cause
unmistakably to produce the effect. Her will is the only law,
and as She cannot make a mistake, nature's laws - Her will - can
never be changed. She is the life of the Law of Karma or
causation. She is the fructifier of every action. Under Her
guidance we are manufacturing our lives through our deeds or
Karma.
Freedom is the motive of the universe, freedom its goal. The
laws of nature are the methods through which we are struggling
to reach that freedom, under the guidance of Mother. This
universal struggle for freedom attains its highest expression in
man in the conscious desire to be free.
This freedom is attained by the threefold means of - work,
worship, and knowledge.
(a) Work - constant, unceasing effort to help others and love
others.
(b) Worship - consists in prayer, praise and meditation.
(c) Knowledge – that follows meditation.
THE BELUR MATH: AN APPEAL
The success which attended the labours of the disciples of Shri
Ramakrishna Paramahamsa in diffusing the principles of Hindu
religion and obtaining some respect for our much abused faith in
the West, gave rise to the hope of training a number of young
Sannyâsins to carry on the propaganda, both in and out of India.
And an attempt is being made to educate a number of young men
according to the Vedic principle of students living in touch
with the Guru.
A Math has already been started on the Ganga near Calcutta,
through the kindness of some European and American friends.
The work, to produce any visible results in a short time,
requires funds and hence this appeal to those who are in
sympathy with our efforts.
It is intended to extend the operations of the Math, by
educating in the Math as many young men as the funds can afford,
in both Western science and Indian spirituality, so that in
addition to the advantages of a University education, they will
acquire a manly discipline by living in contact with their
teachers.
The central Math near Calcutta will gradually start branches in
other parts of the country as men become ready and the means are
forthcoming.
It is a work which will take time to bring forth any permanent
result and requires a great deal of sacrifice on the part of our
young men and on those who have the means of helping this work.
We believe the men are ready, and our appeal therefore is to
those who really love their religion and their country and have
the means to show their sympathy practically by helping the
cause.
VIVEKANANDA.
THE ADVAITA ASHRAMA, HIMALAYAS
(These lines there sent in a letter, March, 1899, by Swamiji,
for embodying in the prospectus of the Advaita Ashrama,
Mayavati, Almora, Himalayas.)
In Whom is the Universe, Who is in the Universe, Who is the
Universe; in Whom is the Soul, Who is in the Soul, Who is the
Soul of Man; knowing Him -and therefore the Universe -as our
Self, alone extinguishes all fear, brings an end to misery and
leads to Infinite Freedom. Wherever there has been expansion in
love or progress in well-being, of individuals or numbers, it
has been through the perception, realisation, and the
practicalisation of the Eternal Truth -THE ONENESS OF ALL
BEINGS. "Dependence is misery. Independence is happiness." The
Advaita is the only system which gives unto man complete
possession of himself, takes off all dependence and its
associated superstitions, thus making us brave to suffer, brave
to do, and in the long run attain to Absolute Freedom.
Hitherto it has not been possible to preach this Noble Truth
entirely free from the settings of dualistic weakness; this
alone, we are convinced, explains why it has not been more
operative and useful to mankind at large.
To give this ONE TRUTH a freer and fuller scope in elevating the
lives of individuals and leavening the mass of mankind, we start
this Advaita Ashrama on the Himalayan heights, the land of its
first expiration.
Here it is hoped to keep Advaita free from all superstitions and
weakening contaminations. Here will be taught and practiced
nothing but the Doctrine of Unity, pure and simple; and though
in entire sympathy with all other systems, this Ashrama is
dedicated to Advaita and Advaita alone.
THE RAMAKRISHNA HOME OF SERVICE VARANASI: AN APPEAL
(Letter written by Swamiji, to accompany the First Report of the
Ramakrishna Home of Service, Varanasi, February, 1902.)
DEAR -
We beg your acceptance of the past year's Report of the
Ramakrishna Home of Service, Varanasi, embodying a short
statement of our humble efforts towards the amelioration,
however little, of the miserable state into which a good many of
our fellow-beings, generally old men and women, are cast in this
city.
In these days of intellectual awakening and steadily asserting
public opinion, the holy places of the Hindus, their condition,
and method of work have not escaped tile keen eye of criticism;
and this city, being the holy of holies to all Hindus, has not
failed to attract its full share of censure.
In other sacred places people go to purify themselves from sin,
and their connection with these places is casual, and of a few
day's duration. In this, the nicest ancient and living centre of
Aryan religious activity, there come men and women, and as a
rule, old and decrepit, waiting to pass unto Eternal Freedom,
through the greatest of all sanctifications, death under the
shadow of the temple of the Lord of the universe.
And then there are those who have renounced everything for the
good of the world and have for ever lost the helping hands of
their own flesh and blood and childhood's associations.
They too are overtaken by the common lot of humanity, physical
evil in the form of disease.
It may be true that some blame attaches to the management of the
place. It may be true that the priests deserve a good part of
the sweeping criticism generally heaped upon them; yet we must
not forget the great truth -like people, like priests. If the
people stand be with folded hands and watch the swift current of
misery rushing past their doors, dragging men, women and
children, the Sannyâsin and the householder into one common
whirlpool of helpless suffering, and make not the least effort
to save any from the current, only waxing eloquent at the
misdoings of the priests of the holy places not one particle of
suffering can ever be lessened, not one ever be helped.
Do we want to keep up the faith of our forefathers in the
efficacy of the Eternal City of Shiva towards salvation?
If we do, we ought to be glad to see the number of those
increase from year to year who come here to die.
And blessed be the name of the Lord that the poor have this
eager desire for salvation, the same as ever.
The poor who come here to die have voluntarily cut themselves
off from any help they could have received in the places of
their birth, and when disease overtakes them, their condition we
leave to your imagination and to your conscience as a Hindu to
feel and to rectify.
Brother, does it not make you pause and think of the marvellous
attraction of this wonderful place of preparation for final
rest? Does it not strike you with a mysterious sense of awe
-this age-old and never-ending stream of pilgrims marching to
salvation through death?
If it does -come and lend us a helping hand.
Never mind if your contribution is only a mite, your help only a
little; blades of grass united into a rope will hold in
confinement the maddest of elephants -says the old proverb.
Ever yours in the Lord of the universe,
VIVEKANANDA.
WHO KNOWS HOW MOTHER PLAYS!
Perchance a prophet thou -
Who knows? Who dares touch
The depths where Mother hides
Her silent failless bolts!
Perchance the child had glimpse
Of shades, behind the scenes,
With eager eyes and strained,
Quivering forms -ready
To jump in front and be
Events! resistless, strong.
Who knows but Mother, how,
And where, and when, they come?
Perchance the shining sage
Saw more than he could tell;
Who knows, what soul, and when,
The Mother makes Her throne?
What law would freedom bind?
What merit guide Her will,
Whose freak is greatest order,
Whose will resistless law?
To child may glories ope
Which father never dreamt;
May thousand fold in daughter
Her powers Mother store.
TO THE FOURTH OF JULY
[It is well known that Swami Vivekananda's death (or
resurrection, as some of us would prefer to call it!) took place
on the 4th of July, 1902. On the 4th of July, 1898, he was
travelling with some American disciples in Kashmir, and as part
of a domestic conspiracy for the celebration of the day -the
anniversary of the American Declaration of Independence -he
prepared the following poem, to be read aloud at the early
breakfast. The poem itself fell to the keeping of Dhirâ Mâtâ.]
Behold, the dark clouds melt away,
That gathered thick at night, and hung
So like a gloomy pall above the earth!
Before thy magic touch, the world
Awakes. The birds in chorus sing.
The flowers raise their star-like crowns -
Dew-set, and wave thee welcome fair.
The lakes are opening wide in love
Their hundred thousand lotus-eyes
To welcome thee, with all their depth.
All hail to thee, thou Lord of Light!
A welcome new to thee, today,
O Sun! Today thou sheddest Liberty!
Bethink thee how the world did wait,
And search for thee, through time and clime.
Some gave up home and love of friends,
And went in quest of thee, self-banished,
Through dreary oceans, through primeval forests,
Each step a struggle for their life or death;
Then came the day when work bore fruit,
And worship, love, and sacrifice,
Fulfilled, accepted, and complete.
Then thou, propitious, rose to shed
The light of Freedom on mankind.
Move on, O Lord, in thy resistless path!
Till thy high noon o'erspreads the world.
Till every land reflects thy light,
Till men and women, with uplifted head,
Behold their shackles broken, and
Know, in springing joy, their life renewed!
THE EAST AND THE WEST
(Translated from Bengali)
I. INTRODUCTION (Bengali)
II. CUSTOMS: EASTERN AND WESTERN (Bengali)
III. FOOD AND COOKING (Bengali)
IV. CIVILISATION IN DRESS (Bengali)
V. ETIQUETTE AND MANNERS (Bengali)
VI. FRANCE -PARIS (Bengali)
VII. PROGRESS OF CIVILISATION (Bengali)
I. INTRODUCTION
Vast and deep rivers -swelling and impetuous -charming
pleasure-gardens by the river banks, putting to shame the
celestial Nandana-Kânana; amidst these pleasure-gardens rise,
towering to the sky, beautiful marble palaces, decorated with
the most exquisite workmanship of fine art; on the sides, in
front, and behind, clusters of huts, with crumbling mud-walls
and dilapidated roofs, the bamboos of which, forming their
skeletons, as it were, are exposed to view; moving about here
and there emaciated figures of young and old in tattered rags,
whose faces bear deep-cut lines of the despair and poverty of
hundreds of years; cows, bullocks, buffaloes everywhere -ay, the
same melancholy look in their eyes, the same feeble physique; on
the wayside refuse and dirt: This is our present-day India!
Worn-out huts by the very side of palaces, piles of refuse in
the near proximity of temples, the Sannyâsin clad with only a
little loin-cloth, walking by the gorgeously dressed, the
pitiful gaze of lustreless eyes of the hunger-stricken at the
well-fed and the amply-provided: This is our native land!
Devastation by violent plague and cholera; malaria eating into
the very vitals of the nation; starvation and semi-starvation as
second nature; death-like famine often dancing its tragic dance;
the Kurukshetra (battlefield) of malady and misery, the huge
cremation ground, strewn with the dead bones of lost hope,
activity, joy, and courage; and in the midst of that, sitting in
august silence, the Yogi, absorbed in deep communion with the
Spirit, with no other goal in life than Moksha: This is what
meets the eye of the European traveller in India.
A conglomeration of three hundred million souls, resembling men
only in appearance, crushed out of life by being downtrodden by
their own people and foreign nations, by people professing their
own religion and by others of foreign faiths; patient in labour
and suffering and devoid of initiative like the slave; without
any hope, without any past, without any future; desirous only of
maintaining the present life anyhow, however precarious; of
malicious nature befitting a slave, to whom the prosperity of
their fellow-men is unbearable; bereft of Shraddhâ, like one
with whom all hope is dead, faithless; whose weapon of defence
is base trickery, treachery, and slyness like that of a fox; the
embodiment of selfishness; licking the dust of the feet of the
strong, withal dealing a death-blow to those who are
comparatively weak; full of ugly, diabolical superstitions which
come naturally to those who are weak and hopeless of the future;
without any standard of morality as their backbone; three
hundred millions of souls such as these are swarming on the body
of India like so many worms on a rotten, stinking carcass: This
is the picture concerning us, which naturally presents itself to
the English official!
Maddened with the wine of newly acquired powers; devoid of
discrimination between right and wrong; fierce like wild beasts,
henpecked, lustful; drenched in liquor, having no idea of
chastity or purity, nor of cleanly ways and habits; believing in
matter only, with a civilisation resting on matter and its
various applications; addicted to the aggrandisement of self by
exploiting others' countries, others' wealth, by force, trick,
and treachery; having no faith in the life hereafter, whose
Âtman (Self) is the body, whose whole life is only in the senses
and creature comforts: Thus, to the Indian, the Westerner is the
veriest demon (Asura).
These are the views of observers on both sides -views born of
mutual indiscrimination and superficial knowledge or ignorance.
The foreigners, the Europeans, come to India, live in palatial
buildings in the perfectly clean and healthy quarters of our
towns and compare our "native" quarters with their neat and
beautifully laid-out cities at home; the Indians with whom they
come in contact are only of one class -those who hold some sort
of employment under them. And, indeed, distress and poverty are
nowhere else to be met with as in India; besides that, there is
no gainsaying that dirt and filth are everywhere. To the
European mind, it is inconceivable that anything good can
possibly be amidst such dirt, such slavery, and such
degradation.
We, on the other hand, see that the Europeans eat without
discrimination whatever they get, have no idea of cleanliness as
we have, do not observe caste distinctions, freely mix with
women, drink wine, and shamelessly dance at a ball, men and
women held in each other's arms: and we ask ourselves in
amazement, what good can there be in such a nation?
Both these views are derived from without, and do not look
within and below the surface. We do not allow foreigners to mix
in our society, and we call them Mlechchhas; they also in their
turn hate us as slaves and call us "niggers". In both of these
views there must be some truth, though neither of the parties
has seen the real thing behind the other.
With every man, there is an idea; the external man is only the
outward manifestation, the mere language of this idea within.
Likewise, every nation has a corresponding national idea. This
idea is working for the world and is necessary for its
preservation. The day when the necessity of an idea as an
element for the preservation of the world is over, that very day
the receptacle of that idea, whether it be an individual or a
nation, will meet destruction. The reason that we Indians are
still living, in spite of so much misery, distress, poverty, and
oppression from within and without is that we have a national
idea, which is yet necessary for the preservation of the world.
The Europeans too have a national idea of their own, without
which the world will not go on; therefore they are so strong.
Does a man live a moment, if he loses all his strength? A nation
is the sum total of so many individual men; will a nation live
if it has utterly lost all its strength and activity? Why did
not this Hindu race die out, in the face of so many troubles and
tumults of a thousand years? If our customs and manners are so
very bad, how is it that we have not been effaced from the face
of the earth by this time? Have the various foreign conquerors
spared any pains to crush us out? Why, then, were not the Hindus
blotted out of existence, as happened with men in other
countries which are uncivilised? Why was not India depopulated
and turned into a wilderness? Why, then foreigners would have
lost no time to come and settle in India, and till her fertile
lands in the same way as they did and are still doing in
America, Australia, and Africa! Well, then, my foreigner, you
are not so strong as you think yourself to be; it is a vain
imagination. First understand that India has strength as well,
has a substantial reality of her own yet. Furthermore,
understand that India is still living, because she has her own
quota yet to give to the general store of the world's
civilisation. And you too understand this full well, I mean
those of our countrymen who have become thoroughly Europeanised
both in external habits and in ways of thought and ideas, and
who are continually crying their eyes out and praying to the
European to save them -"We are degraded, we have come down to
the level of brutes; O ye European people, you are our saviours,
have pity on us and raise us from this fallen state!" And you
too understand this, who are singing Te Deums and raising a hue
and cry that Jesus is come to India, and are seeing the
fulfilment of the divine decree in the fullness of time. Oh,
dear! No! neither Jesus is come nor Jehovah; nor will they come;
they are now busy in saving their own hearths and homes and have
no time to come to our country. Here is the selfsame Old Shiva
seated as before, the bloody Mother Kâli worshipped with the
selfsame paraphernalia, the pastoral Shepherd of Love, Shri
Krishna, playing on His flute. Once this Old Shiva, riding on
His bull and laboring on His Damaru travelled from India, on the
one side, to Sumatra, Borneo, Celebes, Australia, as far as the
shores of America, and on the other side, this Old Shiva
battened His bull in Tibet, China, Japan, and as far up as
Siberia, and is still doing the same. The Mother Kali is still
exacting Her worship even in China and Japan: it is She whom the
Christians metamorphosed into the Virgin Mary, and worship as
the mother of Jesus the Christ. Behold the Himalayas! There to
the north is Kailâs, the main abode of the Old Shiva. That
throne the ten-headed, twenty-armed, mighty Ravana could not
shake -now for the missionaries to attempt the task? -Bless my
soul! Here in India will ever be the Old Shiva laboring on his
Damaru, the Mother Kali worshipped with animal sacrifice, and
the lovable Shri Krishna playing on His flute. Firm as the
Himalayas they are; and no attempts of anyone, Christian or
other missionaries, will ever be able to remove them. If you
cannot bear them -avaunt! For a handful of you, shall a whole
nation be wearied out of all patience and bored to death ? Why
don't you make your way somewhere else where you may find fields
to graze upon freely -the wide world is open to you! But no,
that they won't do. Where is that strength to do it? They would
eat the salt of that Old Shiva and play Him false, slander Him,
and sing the glory of a foreign Saviour -dear me! To such of our
countrymen who go whimpering before foreigners -"We are very
low, we are mean, we are degraded, everything we have is
diabolical" -to them we say: "Yes, that may be the truth,
forsooth, because you profess to be truthful and we have no
reason to disbelieve you; but why do you include the whole
nation in that We? Pray, sirs, what sort of good manner is
that?"
First, we have to understand that there are not any good
qualities which are the privileged monopoly of one nation only.
Of course, as with individuals, so with nations, there may be a
prevalence of certain good qualities, more or less in one nation
than in another.
With us, the prominent idea is Mukti; with the Westerners, it is
Dharma. What we desire is Mukti; what they want is Dharma. Here
the word "Dharma" is used in the sense of the Mimâmsakas. What
is Dharma? Dharma is that which makes man seek for happiness in
this world or the next. Dharma is established on work, Dharma is
impelling man day and night to run after and work for happiness.
What is Mukti? That which teaches that even the happiness of
this life is slavery, and the same is the happiness of the life
to come, because neither this world nor the next is beyond the
laws of nature; only, the slavery of this world is to that of
the next as an iron chain is to a golden one. Again, happiness,
wherever it may be, being within the laws of nature, is subject
to death and will not last ad infinitum. Therefore man must
aspire to become Mukta, he must go beyond the bondage of the
body; slavery will not do. This Mokshapath is only in India and
nowhere else. Hence is true the oft-repeated saying that Mukta
souls are only in India and in no other country. But it is
equally true that in future they will be in other countries as
well; that is well and good, and a thing of great pleasure to
us. There was a time in India when Dharma was compatible with
Mukti. There were worshippers of Dharma, such as Yudhishthira,
Arjuna, Duryodhana, Bhishma, and Karna, side by side with the
aspirants of Mukti, such as Vyâsa, Shuka, and Janaka. On the
advent of Buddhism, Dharma was entirely neglected, and the path
of Moksha alone became predominant. Hence, we read in the Agni
Purâna, in the language of similes, that the demon Gayâsura
-that is, Buddha (Swamiji afterwards changed this view with
reference to Buddha, as is evident from the letter dated
Varanasi, the 9th February, 1902, in this volume.) -tried to
destroy the world by showing the path of Moksha to all; and
therefore the Devas held a council and by stratagem set him at
rest for ever. However, the central fact is that the fall of our
country, of which we hear so much spoken, is due to the utter
want of this Dharma. If the whole nation practices and follows
the path of Moksha, that is well and good; but is that possible?
Without enjoyment, renunciation can never come; first enjoy and
then you can renounce. Otherwise, if the whole nation, all of a
sudden, takes up Sannyâsa, it does not gain what it desires, but
it loses what it had into the bargain -the bird in the hand is
fled, nor is that in the bush caught. When, in the heyday of
Buddhistic supremacy, thousands of Sannyâsins lived in every
monastery, then it was that the country was just on the verge of
its ruin! The Bauddhas, the Christians, the Mussulmans, and the
Jains prescribe, in their folly, the same law and the same rule
for all. That is a great mistake; education, habits, customs,
laws, and rules should be different for different men and
nations, in conformity with their difference of temperament.
What will it avail, if one tries to make them all uniform by
compulsion? The Bauddhas declared, "Nothing is more desirable in
life than Moksha; whoever you are, come one and all to take it."
I ask, "Is that ever possible?" "You are a householder, you must
not concern yourself much with things of that sort: you do your
Svadharma (natural duty)" -thus say the Hindu scriptures.
Exactly so! He who cannot leap one foot, is going to jump across
the ocean to Lankâ in one bound! Is it reason? You cannot feed
your own family or dole out food to two of your fellow-men, you
cannot do even an ordinary piece of work for the common good, in
harmony with others -and you are running after Mukti! The Hindu
scriptures say, "No doubt, Moksha is far superior to Dharma; but
Dharma should be finished first of all". The Bauddhas were
confounded just there and brought about all sorts of mischief.
Non-injury is right; "Resist not evil" is a great thing -these
are indeed grand principles; but the scriptures say, "Thou art a
householder; if anyone smites thee on thy cheek, and thou dost
not return him an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, thou wilt
verily be a sinner." Manu says, "When one has come to kill you,
there is no sin in killing him, even though he be a Brâhmin"
(Manu, VIII. 350). This is very true, and this is a thing which
should not be forgotten. Heroes only enjoy the world. Show your
heroism; apply, according to circumstances, the fourfold
political maxims of conciliation, bribery, sowing dissensions,
and open war, to win over your adversary and enjoy the world
-then you will be Dhârmika (righteous). Otherwise, you live a
disgraceful life if you pocket your insults when you are kicked
and trodden down by anyone who takes it into his head to do so;
your life is a veritable hell here, and so is the life
hereafter. This is what the Shastras say. Do your Svadharma
-this is truth, the truth of truths. This is my advice to you,
my beloved co-religionists. Of course, do not do any wrong, do
not injure or tyrannise over anyone, but try to do good to
others as much as you can. But passively to submit to wrong done
by others is a sin -with the householder. He must try to pay
them back in their own coin then and there. The householder must
earn money with great effort and enthusiasm, and by that must
support and bring comforts to his own family and to others, and
perform good works as far as possible. If you cannot do that,
how do you profess to be a man? You are not a householder even
-what to talk of Moksha for you!!
We have said before that Dharma is based on work. The nature of
the Dharmika is constant performance of action with efficiency.
Why, even the opinion of some Mimamsakas is that those parts of
the Vedas which do not enjoin work are not, properly speaking,
Vedas at all. One of the aphorisms of Jaimini runs "आम्नायस्य
क्रियार्थत्वादानर्थक्यमतदर्थानाम् - The purpose of the Vedas
being work, those parts of the Vedas that do not deal with work
miss the mark."
"By constant repetition of the syllable Om and by meditating on
its meaning, everything can be obtained"; "All sins are washed
away by uttering the name of the Lord"; "He gets all, who
resigns himself to the Will of God" -yes, these words of the
Shastras and the sages are, no doubt, true. But, do you see,
thousands of us are, for our whole life, meditating on Om, are
getting ecstatic in devotion in the name of the Lord, and are
crying, "Thy Will be done, I am fully resigned to Thee! " -and
what are they actually getting in return? Absolutely nothing!
How do you account for this? The reason lies here, and it must
be fully understood. Whose meditation is real and effective? Who
can really resign himself to the Will of God? Who can utter with
power irresistible, like that of a thunderbolt, the name of the
Lord? It is he who has earned Chitta-shuddhi, that is, whose
mind has been purified by work, or in other words, he who is the
Dharmika.
Every individual is a centre for the manifestation of a
certain force. This force has been stored up as the resultant of
our previous works, and each one of us is born with this force
at his back. So long as this force has not worked itself out,
who can possibly remain quiet and give up work? Until then, he
will have to enjoy or suffer according to the fruition of his
good or bad work and will be irresistibly impelled to do work.
Since enjoyment and work cannot be given up till then, is it not
better to do good rather than bad works -to enjoy happiness
rather than suffer misery? Shri Râmprasâd (A Bengali saint,
devotee of Kâli, and an inspired poet who composed songs in
praise of the Deity, expressing the highest truths of religion
in the simplest words.) used to say, "They speak of two works,
'good' and 'bad'; of them, it is better to do the good."
Now what is that good which is to be pursued? The good for him
who desires Moksha is one, and the good for him who wants Dharma
is another. This is the great truth which the Lord Shri Krishna,
the revealer of the Gita, has tried therein to explain, and upon
this great truth is established the Varnâshrama (Four castes and
four stages of life.) system and the doctrine of Svadharma etc.
of the Hindu religion.
अद्वेष्टा सर्वभूतानां मैत्रः करुण एव च ।
निर्ममो निरहंकारः समदुःखसुखः क्षमी ॥
- "He who has no enemy, and is friendly and compassionate
towards all, who is free from the feelings of 'me and mine',
even-minded in pain and pleasure, and forbearing" -these and
other epithets of like nature are for him whose one goal in life
is Moksha. (Gita, XII. 13.)
क्लैब्यं मा स्म गमः पार्थ नैतत्त्वय्युपपद्यते ।
क्षुद्रं हृदयदौर्बल्यं त्यक्त्वोत्तिष्ठ परन्तप ॥
- "Yield not to unmanliness, O son of Prithâ! Ill cloth it befit
thee. Cast off this mean faint-heartedness and arise. O scorcher
of thine enemies." (Gita, II. 3.)
तस्मात्त्वमुत्तिष्ठ यशो लभस्व जित्वा शत्रून् भुङ्क्ष्व राज्यं
समृद्धम् ।
मयैवैते निहताः पूर्वमेव निमित्तमात्रं भव सव्यसाचिन् ॥
- "Therefore do thou arise and acquire fame. After conquering
thy enemies, enjoy unrivalled dominion; verily, by Myself have
they been already slain; be thou merely the instrument, O
Savyasâchin (Arjuna)." (Gita, XI. 33.)
In these and similar passages in the Gita the Lord is showing
the way to Dharma. Of course, work is always mixed with good and
evil, and to work, one has to incur sin, more or less. But what
of that? Let it be so. Is not something better than nothing? Is
not insufficient food better than going without any? Is not
doing work, though mixed with good and evil, better than doing
nothing and passing an idle and inactive life, and being like
stones? The cow never tells a lie, and the stone never steals,
but, nevertheless, the cow remains a cow and the stone a stone.
Man steals and man tells lies, and again it is man that becomes
a god. With the prevalence of the Sâttvika essence, man becomes
inactive and rests always in a state of deep Dhyâna or
contemplation; with the prevalence of the Rajas, he does bad as
well as good works; and with the prevalence of the Tamas again,
he becomes inactive and inert. Now, tell me, looking from
outside, how are we to understand, whether you are in a state
wherein the Sattva or the Tamas prevails? Whether we are in the
state of Sattvika calmness, beyond all pleasure and pain, and
past all work and activity, or whether we are in the lowest
Tâmasika state, lifeless, passive, dull as dead matter, and
doing no work, because there is no power in us to do it, and
are, thus, silently and by degrees, getting rotten and corrupted
within -I seriously ask you this question and demand an answer.
Ask your own mind, and you shall know what the reality is. But,
what need to wait for the answer? The tree is known by its
fruit. The Sattva prevailing, the man is inactive, he is calm,
to be sure; but that inactivity is the outcome of the
centralization of great powers, that calmness is the mother of
tremendous energy. That highly Sattivka man, that great soul,
has no longer to work as we do with hands and feet -by his mere
willing only, all his works are immediately accomplished to
perfection. That man of predominating Sattva is the Brahmin, the
worshipped of all. Has he to go about from door to door, begging
others to worship him? The Almighty Mother of the universe
writes with Her own hand, in golden letters on his forehead,
"Worship ye all, this great one, this son of Mine", and the
world reads and listens to it and humbly bows down its head
before him in obedience. That man is really -
अद्वेष्टा सर्वभूतानां मैत्रः करुण एव च ।
निर्ममो निरहंकारः समदुःखसुखः क्षमी ॥
- "He who has no enemy, and is friendly and compassionate
towards all, who is free from the feelings of 'me and mine',
even-minded in pain and pleasure, and forbearing." (Gita, XII.
13.) And mark you, those things which you see in pusillanimous,
effeminate folk who speak in a nasal tone chewing every
syllable, whose voice is as thin as of one who has been starving
for a week, who are like a tattered wet rag, who never protest
or are moved even if kicked by anybody -those are the signs of
the lowest Tamas, those are the signs of death, not of Sattva
-all corruption and stench. It is because Arjuna was going to
fall into the ranks of these men that the Lord is explaining
matters to him so elaborately in the Gita. Is that not the fact?
Listen to the very first words that came out of the mouth of the
Lord, "क्लैब्यं मा स्म गमः पार्थ नैतत्त्वय्युपपद्यते - Yield not
to unmanliness, O Pârtha! Ill, doth it befit thee!" and then
later, "तस्मात्त्वमुत्तिष्ठ यशो लभस्व - Therefore do thou arise
and acquire fame." Coming under the influence of the Jains,
Buddhas, and others, we have joined the lines of those Tamasika
people. During these last thousand years, the whole country is
filling the air with the name of the Lord and is sending its
prayers to Him; and the Lord is never lending His ears to them.
And why should He? When even man never hears the cries of the
fool, do you think God will? Now the only way out is to listen
to the words of the Lord in the Gita, "क्लैब्यं मा स्म गमः पार्थ
- Yield not to unmanliness, O Partha!" "तस्मात्त्वमुत्तिष्ठ यशो
लभस्व - Therefore do thou arise and acquire fame."
Now let us go on with our subject-matter -the East and the West.
First see the irony of it. Jesus Christ, the God of the
Europeans, has taught: Have no enemy, bless them that curse you;
whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the
other also; stop all your work and be ready for the next world;
the end of the world is near at hand. And our Lord in the Gita
is saying: Always work with great enthusiasm, destroy your
enemies and enjoy the world. But, after all, it turned out to be
exactly the reverse of what Christ or Krishna implied. The
Europeans never took the words of Jesus Christ seriously. Always
of active habits, being possessed of a tremendous Râjasika
nature, they are gathering with great enterprise and youthful
ardour the comforts and luxuries of the different countries of
the world and enjoying them to their hearts' content. And we are
sitting in a corner, with our bag and baggage, pondering on
death day and night, and singing,"नलिनीदलगतजलमतितरलं
तद्वज्जीवितमतिशयचपलम् - Very tremulous and unsteady is the water
on the lotus-leaf; so is the life of man frail and transient" -
with the result that it is making our blood run cold and our
flesh creep with the fear of Yama, the god of death; and Yama,
too, alas, has taken us at our word, as it were -plague and all
sorts of maladies have entered into our country! Who are
following the teachings of the Gita? - the Europeans. And who
are acting according to the will of Jesus Christ? -The
descendants of Shri Krishna! This must be well understood. The
Vedas were the first to find and proclaim the way to Moksha, and
from that one source, the Vedas, was taken whatever any great
Teacher, say, Buddha or Christ, afterwards taught. Now, they
were Sannyasins, and therefore they "had no enemy and were
friendly and compassionate towards all". That was well and good
for them. But why this attempt to compel the whole world to
follow the same path to Moksha? "Can beauty be manufactured by
rubbing and scrubbing? Can anybody's love be won by threats or
force?" What does Buddha or Christ prescribe for the man who
neither wants Moksha nor is fit to receive it? - Nothing! Either
you must have Moksha or you are doomed to destruction - these
are the only two ways held forth by them, and there is no middle
course. You are tied hand and foot in the matter of trying for
anything other than Moksha. There is no way shown how you may
enjoy the world a little for a time; not only all openings to
that are hermetically sealed to you, but, in addition, there are
obstructions put at every step. It is only the Vedic religion
which considers ways and means and lays down rules for the
fourfold attainment of man, comprising Dharma, Artha, Kama, and
Moksha. Buddha ruined us, and so did Christ ruin Greece and
Rome! Then, in due course of time, fortunately, the Europeans
became Protestants, shook off the teachings of Christ as
represented by Papal authority, and heaved a sigh of relief. In
India, Kumârila again brought into currency the Karma-Mârga, the
way of Karma only, and Shankara and Râmânuja firmly
re-established the Eternal Vedic religion, harmonising and
balancing in due proportions Dharma, Artha, Kama, and Moksha.
Thus the nation was brought to the way of regaining its lost
life; but India has three hundred million souls to wake, and
hence the delay. To revive three hundred millions -can it be
done in a day?
The aims of the Buddhistic and the Vedic religions are the same,
but the means adopted by the Buddhistic are not right. If the
Buddhistic means were correct, then why have we been thus
hopelessly lost and ruined? It will not do to say that the
efflux of time has naturally wrought this. Can time work,
transgressing the laws of cause and effect?
Therefore, though the aims are the same, the Bauddhas for want
of right means have degraded India. Perhaps my Bauddha brothers
will be offended at this remark, and fret and fume; but there's
no help for it; the truth ought to be told, and I do not care
for the result. The right and correct means is that of the Vedas
-the Jâti Dharma, that is, the Dharma enjoined according to the
different castes -the Svadharma, that is, one's own Dharma, or
set of duties prescribed for man according to his capacity and
position -which is the very basis of Vedic religion and Vedic
society. Again, perhaps, I am offending many of my friends, who
are saying, I suppose, that I am flattering my own countrymen.
Here let me ask them once for all: What do I gain by such
flattery? Do they support me with any money or means? On the
contrary, they try their best to get possession of money which I
secure by begging from outside of India for feeding the
famine-stricken and the helpless; and if they do not get it,
they abuse and slander! Such then, O my educated country men,
are the people of my country. I know them too well to expect
anything from them by flattery. I know they have to be treated
like the insane; and anyone who administers medicine to a madman
must be ready to be rewarded with kicks and bites; but he is the
true friend who forces the medicine down the throats of such and
bears with them in patience.
Now, this Jati Dharma, this Svadharma, is the path of welfare of
all societies in every land, the ladder to ultimate freedom.
With the decay of this Jati Dharma, this Svadharma, has come the
downfall of our land. But the Jati Dharma or Svadharma as
commonly understood at present by the higher castes is rather a
new evil, which has to be guarded against. They think they know
everything of Jati Dharma, but really they know nothing of it.
Regarding their own village customs as the eternal customs laid
down by the Vedas, and appropriating to themselves all
privileges, they are going to their doom! I am not talking of
caste as determined by qualitative distinction, but of the
hereditary caste system. I admit that the qualitative caste
system is the primary one; but the pity is qualities yield to
borth in two or three generations. Thus the vital point of our
national life has been touched; otherwise, why should we sink to
this degraded state? Read in the Gita, "संकरस्य च कर्ता
स्यामुपहन्यामिमाः प्रजाः - I should then be the cause of the
admixture of races, and I should thus ruin these beings." How
came this terrible Varna-Sâmkarya -this confounding mixture of
all castes -and disappearance of all qualitative distinctions?
Why has the white complexion of our forefathers now become
black? Why did the Sattvaguna give place to the prevailing Tamas
with a sprinkling, as it were, of Rajas in it? That is a long
story to tell, and I reserve my answer for some future occasion.
For the present, try to understand this, that if the Jati Dharma
be rightly and truly preserved, the nation shall never fall. If
this is true, then what was it that brought our downfall? That
we have fallen is the sure sign that the basis of the Jati
Dharma has been tampered with. Therefore, what you call the Jati
Dharma is quite contrary to what we have in fact. First, read
your own Shastras through and through, and you will easily see
that what the Shastras define as caste-Dharma, has disappeared
almost everywhere from the land. Now try to bring back the true
Jati Dharma, and then it will be a real and sure boon to the
country. What I have learnt and understood, I am telling you
plainly. I have not been imported from some foreign land to come
and save you, that I should countenance all your foolish customs
and give scientific explanations for them; it does not cost our
foreign friends anything, they can well afford to do so. You
cheer them up and heap applause upon them, and that is the acme
of their ambition. But if dirt and dust be flung at your faces,
it falls on mine too! Don't you see that?
I have said elsewhere that every nation has a national purpose
of its own. Either in obedience to the Law of nature, or by
virtue of the superior genius of the great ones, the social
manners and customs of every nation are being moulded into
shape, so as to bring that purpose to fruition. In the life of
every nation, besides that purpose and those manners and customs
that are essentially necessary to effect that purpose, all
others are superfluous. It does not matter much whether those
superfluous customs and manners grow or disappear; but a nation
is sure to die when the main purpose of its life is hurt.
When we were children, we heard the story of a certain ogress
who had her soul living in a small bird, and unless the bird was
killed, the ogress would never die. The life of a nation is also
like that. Again another thing you will observe, that a nation
will never greatly grudge if it be deprived of these rights
which have not much to do with its national purpose, nay, even
if all of such are wrested from it; but when the slightest blow
is given to that purpose on which rests its national life, that
moment it reacts with tremendous power.
Take for instance the case of the three living nations, of whose
history you know more or less, viz. the French, the English, and
the Hindu. Political independence is the backbone of the French
character. French subjects bear calmly all oppressions. Burden
them with heavy taxes, they will not raise the least voice
against them; compel the whole nation to join the army, they
never complain; but the instant anyone meddles with that
political independence, the whole nation will rise as one man
and madly react. No one man shall be allowed to usurp authority
over us; whether learned or ignorant, rich or poor, of noble
birth or of the lower classes, we have equal share in the
Government of our country, and in the independent control of our
society -this is the root-principle of the French character. He
must suffer Who will try to interfere with this freedom.
In the English character, the "give and take" policy, the
business principle of the trader, is principally inherent. To
the English, just and equitable distribution of wealth is of
essential interest. The Englishman humbly submits to the king
and to the privileges of the nobility; only if he has to pay a
farthing from his pocket, he must demand an account of it. There
is the king; that is all right; he is ready to obey and honour
him; but if the king wants money, the Englishman says: All
right, but first let me understand why it is needed, what good
it will bring; next, I must have my say in the matter of how it
is to be spent, and then I shall part with it. The king, once
trying to exact money from the English people by force, brought
about a great revolution. They killed the king.
The Hindu says that political and social independence are well
and good, but the real thing is spiritual independence -Mukti.
This is our national purpose; whether you take the Vaidika, the
Jaina, or the Bauddha, the Advaita, the Vishishtâdvaita, or the
Dvaita -there, they are all of one mind. Leave that point
untouched and do whatever you like, the Hindu is quite
unconcerned and keeps silence; but if you run foul of him there,
beware, you court your ruin. Rob him of everything he has, kick
him, call him a "nigger" or any such name, he does not care
much; only keep that one gate of religion free and unmolested.
Look here, how in the modern period the Pathan dynasties were
coming and going, but could not get a firm hold of their Indian
Empire, because they were all along attacking the Hindu's
religion. And see, how firmly based, how tremendously strong was
the Mogul Empire. Why? Because the Moguls left that point
untouched. In fact, Hindus were the real prop of the Mogul
Empire; do you not know that Jahangir, Shahjahan, and Dara
Shikoh were all born of Hindu mothers? Now then observe -as soon
as the ill-fated Aurangzeb again touched that point, the vast
Mogul Empire vanished in an instant like a dream. Why is it that
the English throne is so firmly established in India? Because it
never touches the religion of the land in any way. The sapient
Christian missionaries tried to tamper a little with this point,
and the result was the Mutiny of 1857. So long as the English
understand this thoroughly and act accordingly, their throne in
India will remain unsullied and unshaken. The wise and
far-seeing among the English also comprehend this and admit it
-read Lord Roberts's Forty-one Years in India. (Vide 30th and
31st Chapters.)
Now you understand clearly where the soul of this ogress is -it
is in religion. Because no one was able to destroy that,
therefore the Hindu nation is still living, having survived so
many troubles and tribulations. Well, One Indian scholar asks,
"what is the use of keeping the soul of the nation in religion?
Why not keep it in social or political independence, as is the
case with other nations?" It is very easy to talk like that. If
it be granted, for the sake of argument, that religion and
spiritual independence, and soul, God, and Mukti are all false,
even then see how the matter stands. As the same fire is
manifesting itself in different forms, so the same one great
Force is manifesting itself as political independence with the
French, as mercantile genius and expansion of the sphere of
equity with the English, and as the desire for Mukti or
spiritual independence with the Hindu. Be it noted that by the
impelling of this great Force, has been moulded the French and
the English character, through several centuries of vicissitudes
of fortune; and also by the inspiration of that great Force,
with the rolling of thousands of centuries, has been the present
evolution of the Hindu national character. I ask in all
seriousness -which is easier, to give up our national character
evolved out of thousands of centuries, or your grafted foreign
character of a few hundred years? Why do not the English forget
their warlike habits and give up fighting and bloodshed, and sit
calm and quiet concentrating their whole energy on making
religion the sole aim of their life?
The fact is, that the river has come down a thousand miles from
its source in the mountains; does it, or can it go back to its
source? If it ever tries to trace back its course, it will
simply dry up by being dissipated in all directions. Anyhow the
river is sure to fall into the ocean, sooner or later, either by
passing through open and beautiful plaints or struggling through
grimy soil. If our national life of these ten thousand years has
been a mistake, then there is no help for it; and if we try now
to form a new character, the inevitable result will be that we
shall die.
But, excuse me if I say that it is sheer ignorance and want of
proper understanding to think like that, namely, that our
national ideal has been a mistake. First go to other countries
and study carefully their manners and conditions with your own
eyes -not with others' -and reflect on them with a thoughtful
brain, if you have it: then read your own scriptures, your
ancient literature travel throughout India, and mark the people
of her different parts and their ways and habits with the
wide-awake eye of an intelligent and keen observer -not with a
fool's eye -and you will see as clear as noonday that the nation
is still living intact and its life is surely pulsating. You
will find there also that, hidden under the ashes of apparent
death, the fire of our national life is yet smouldering and that
the life of this nation is religion, its language religion, and
its idea religion; and your politics, society, municipality,
plague-prevention work, and famine-relief work -all these things
will be done as they have been done all along here, viz. only
through religion; otherwise all your frantic yelling and
bewailing will end in nothing, my friend!
Besides, in every country, the means is the same after all, that
is, whatever only a handful of powerful men dictate becomes the
fait accompli; the rest of the men only follow like a flock of
sheep, that's all. I have seen your Parliament, your Senate,
your vote, majority, ballot; it is the same thing everywhere, my
friend. The powerful men in every country are moving society
whatever way they like, and the rest are only like a flock of
sheep. Now the question is this, who are these men of power in
India? -they who are giants in religion. It is they who lead our
society; and it is they again who change our social laws and
usages when necessity demands: and we listen to them silently
anti do what they command. The only difference with ours is,
that we have not that superfluous fuss and bustle of the
majority, the vote, ballot, and similar concomitant tugs-of-war
as in other countries. That is all.
Of course we do not get that education which the common people
in the West do, by the system of vote and ballot etc., but, on
the other hand, we have not also amongst us that class of people
who, in the name of politics, rob others and fatten themselves
by sucking the very life-blood of the masses in all European
countries. If you ever saw, my friend that shocking sight behind
the scene of acting of these politicians -that revelry of
bribery, that robbery in broad daylight, that dance of the Devil
in man, which are practiced on such occasions -you would be
hopeless about man! "Milk goes abegging from door to door, while
the grog-shop is crowded; the chaste woman seldom gets the
wherewithal to hide her modesty, while the woman of the town
flutters about in all her jewelry!" They that have money have
kept the government of the land under their thumb, are robbing
the people and sending them as soldiers to fight and be slain on
foreign shores, so that, in case of victory; their coffers may
be full of gold bought by the blood of the subject-people on the
field of battle. And the subject-people? Well, theirs is only to
shed their blood. This is politics! Don't be startled, my
friend; don't be lost in its mazes.
First of all, try to understand this: Does man make laws, or do
laws make man? Does man make money, or does money make man? Does
man make name and fame, or name and fame make man?
Be a man first, my friend, and you will see how all those things
and the rest will follow of themselves after you. Give up that
hateful malice, that dog-like bickering and barking at one
another, and take your stand on goal purpose, right means,
righteous courage, and be brave When you are born a man, leave
some indelible mark behind you. "When you first came to this
world, O Tulsi (A poet and a devotee -the author of the
Ramcharitmanasa. Here the poet is addressing himself.), the
world rejoiced and you cried; now live your life in doing such
acts that when you will leave this world, the world will cry for
you and you will leave it laughing." If you can do that, then
you are a man; otherwise, what good are you?
Next, you must understand this, my friend, that we have many
things to learn from other nations. The man who says he has
nothing more to learn is already at his last grasp. The nation
that says it knows everything is on the very brink of
destruction! "As long as I live, so long do I learn." But one
point to note here is that when we take anything from others, we
must mould it after our own way. We shall add to our stock what
others have to teach, but we must always be careful to keep
intact what is essentially our own. For instance, Suppose I want
to have my dinner cooked in the European fashion. When taking
food, the Europeans sit on chairs, and we are accustomed to
squat on the floor. To imitate the Europeans, if I order my
dinner to be served, on a table and have to sit on a chair more
than an hour, my feet will be in a fair way of going to Yama's
door, as they say, and I shall writhe in torture; what do you
say to that? So I must squat on the floor in my own style, while
having their dishes. Similarly, whenever we learn anything from
others, we must mould it after our own fashion, always
preserving in full our characteristic nationality. Let me ask,
"Does man wear clothes or do clothes make the man?" The man of
genius in any, dress commands respect; but nobody cares for
fools like me, though carrying, like the washerman's ass, a load
of clothes on my back.